Publish Date
May 27, 2025
A&M Tax Advisor Weekly
One hundred and twenty-two days after President Trump was sworn into office, the House Republicans advanced the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reconciliation bill [1] (the House Bill). As articulated in our prior alert, we were anticipating a business-friendly tax reform package that extends and modifies the expiring Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) provisions, which the House Bill generally achieved. Now, the House Bill heads to the Senate, where all eyes turn to both the Senate Republicans, who have already said that they intend to make changes to the bill, and the Senate Parliamentarian, who will rule on whether provisions can be included in a reconciliation bill. The proposed changes, which are limited to just the provisions addressed in the House Bill, could have far-reaching implications. Although some provisions in the House Bill may change and others could be added by the Senate, we thought it would be helpful to discuss some of the House Bill’s key provisions and their potential impacts.
A&M Insight: The ability to choose between immediate deduction or capitalization and amortization of certain domestic R&E costs offers significant planning opportunities, especially as the House Bill does not modify the TCJA limitation on a taxpayer’s ability to utilize net operating losses (NOLs) (§172). Additionally, the closure of a TCJA loophole affecting the R&E credit (§280C(c)) will require taxpayers to reassess their strategies for managing and reporting these expenses as it could reduce the R&E credit for a vast majority of taxpayers by up to 21 percent. Lastly, with the changes to the business interest expense deduction, it would be beneficial for taxpayers to review their capitalization accounting methods and elections to maximize the recovery of interest expense.
The House Bill does not include corporate tax provisions, which many view as a disappointment. Notably, provisions to lower the corporate income tax rate or repeal or adjust the excise tax on stock repurchases and the corporate alternative minimum tax (CAMT) are absent. Additionally, the House Bill does not include a much-discussed new limitation on the deductibility of state income taxes (like the limitation for individuals). However, the House Bill does expand the limitation on the deductibility of compensation for for-profit corporations (§162(m)). Starting in 2026, compensation paid by all members of a controlled group will be aggregated for purposes of applying the $1 million deduction limitation. Additionally, the determination of the five highest compensated employees during the taxable year (excluding current and historic CEOs, CFOs, and the three highest compensated officers who were not CEOs or CFOs for any given year), which first applies in 2027, will be based on aggregate compensation paid to each individual by all members of the controlled group, potentially changing which employees’ compensation is subject to the deduction limitation; any resulting limitation on deductibility would be allocated pro-rata across all controlled group members paying compensation to the relevant individuals.
A&M Insight: The proposed increase in tax on foreign persons could affect a wide range of taxpayers, including private equity funds, and raises a range of complex issues, including its interplay with statutory exemptions from tax (e.g., the “portfolio interest” exemption) and treaties (e.g., is income that is currently exempt from withholding tax under a treaty subject to US tax under section 899 and, if so, is it only subject to the ratcheting tax rate or the statutory tax rate plus the ratcheting tax rate). Notably, the provision automatically applies with respect to UTPRs and DSTs, and there is no provision allowing the Treasury to exempt specific countries from such application. This could complicate ongoing tariff negotiations and international relations, as well as discourage foreign investment in the US.
A&M Insight: The increase in the qualified business income deduction is unexpected and may prompt companies to reconsider their business structures as the effective tax rate of operating in a flowthrough status (e.g., as a partnership or an S corporation) may be reduced, particularly as the current individual tax rates are proposed to also become permanent. The opportunity zones provision requires careful planning as it only applies to amounts invested in a qualified opportunity fund beginning in 2027.
The House Bill dismantles many green energy incentives:
A&M Insight: The rollback of green energy provisions is significant and notable. Even those in the oil and gas industry generally support the credits. The only notable benefit for the oil and gas industry is the bonus depreciation for certain refining facilities.
The House Bill does not include much-discussed changes to the rules governing carried interest.
The House Bill presents a significant shift in the tax landscape, with far-reaching implications for businesses and individuals alike. While it extends and modifies key TCJA provisions, it also introduces new complexities in international taxation and a significant impact on green energy incentives. In the Senate, Republican members have expressed a wide range of desired changes to the House Bill. On the one hand, deficit hawks are concerned about the bill’s impact on the deficit, while others believe the bill either cuts too much (e.g., in the green energy space) or does not include their desired modifications. Given the slim Republican majorities in both the House and the Senate, finding a compromise will be essential to finalize a tax reform bill. Taxpayers must consider how the evolving tax policies and highly uncertain geopolitical environment could affect their businesses. Strategic planning and reassessment of tax positions will be crucial in navigating these changes. If you would like to discuss how the evolving legislative and regulatory landscape could affect your business strategies and tax planning, please feel free to reach out to Kevin M. Jacobs of our National Tax Office.
[1] https://rules.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/rules.house.gov/files/documents/rcp_119-3_final.pdf as amended by https://amendments-rules.house.gov/amendments/RCP_119-3_Managers_xml%20(002)250521201648156.pdf